TV Schedule

C02

  • Public Topic: Everyone is invited to contribute to C02

    • EPA proposes allowing coal plants to be built near national parks

      Critics fear the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will adopt a rule in the waning days of the Bush administration that will make it easier to build coal-fired power plants near national parks.

      The proposed change, pending since last June, comes as the utility industry moves into its biggest building boom in coal-fueled power plants in decades. To meet growing electricity needs, more than 20 plants are under construction in 14 states and more than 100 are in various stages of planning.

      Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander, the third-ranking Republican in the Senate, vowed in an interview with The Associated Press to push Congress to overrule the EPA if it enacts the rule, perhaps as early as this summer.

      The new rule would change the way states, the EPA and others calculate the impact of a new pollution source, like a coal plant, on a park's maximum pollution load, said John Bunyak of the National Park Service's Air Resources Division in Denver. Instead of weighing peak periods of pollution, the new rule would use annual averages.

      Don Barger, southern regional director for the National Parks Conservation Association, compared it to a person sticking one hand in a block of ice and the other in a fire.

      "Your average temperature is just fine, but your hands are not," he said. "You are getting some real impact there."

      As an example, he said air quality in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, the country's most-visited national park with more than 9 million visitors a year, recently reached an "orange alert" pollution warning. The park straddles the Tennessee-North Carolina border.

      When that happens, "the park is getting hammered. People in the park are getting hammered. Plants in the park are getting hammered," Barger said. "It doesn't matter where it averages out some other time. You have a family from Ohio on vacation. It is the only time they are going to be there. What views can they see? What air are they breathing?"

      EPA spokeswoman Cathy Milbourn said the rule is part of an EPA program to prevent air quality degradation in national parks and would not change the level of emissions allowed in clean-air areas.

      But in a letter to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson, Alexander writes that the National Park Service and the EPA's own regional air quality experts have determined the proposal would result in undercounting of actual pollution sources.

      Alexander wrote that the National Park Service says the rule "provides the lowest possible degree of protection" for 156 so-called Class 1 areas that include the country's most revered national parks and preserves, from Acadia in Maine to Yellowstone in Wyoming.
      Critics fear the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will adopt a rule in the waning days of the Bush administration that will make i... more

      JanforGore

      added this

      29 responses

      21 days ago
    • Scientists invent machine that takes C02 out of the air

      "Scientists say they have invented a machine that can suck carbon dioxide out of the air – potentially creating a vital weapon in the war against global warming.

      The blueprint for the CO2 'scrubber' raises the prospect of a generation of machines which would help reduce the billions of tonnes of greenhouse gases being pumped into the atmosphere by the use of fossil fuels.

      The team of US scientists now plans to build a prototype which would capture one tonne of CO2 from the air every day."
      "Scientists say they have invented a machine that can suck carbon dioxide out of the air – potentially creating a vital weapon in... more

      lemonsun12

      added this

      67 responses

      20 days ago
    • Time Magazine calls biofuels a scam

      Time has weighed in on biofuels, concluding they are a giant scam perpetrated by environmentalists, government, and agribusiness. As government mandates have kicked in, farmers are planting more acreage for corn, which they can sell to ethanol makers. This has driven up food prices, clear cut the Amazon, and likely increased CO2 emissions over just using oil. Time has weighed in on biofuels, concluding they are a giant scam perpetrated by environmentalists, government, and agribusiness. As g... more

      Scott_Bromley

      added this

      52 responses

      2 hours ago
    • Greenbox: Captures Carbon Dioxide to Make Biodiesel

      Well, that's pretty cool.

      PJOnori

      added this

      0 responses

      1 month ago
showing 1 - 4 of 4

related topics
C02

Contributors (109)
C02

JanforGore Marilynn_Murray VoyagerFilms WhiteCrow22 benjaminV onechance ocanada _Hayko PlatoTacius CarolynGillis danitassin Kurka LucienRafagas futuregen Adumbration stopnoise Dmitri_Molotov stephenthomson Amaterasu devo64 dirkglitchmann onepersonsopinion J_Jammer rocktilirot shelchak shazo MajorMajorMajorMajor djaudible27 observer2121 R7 sidcarr diode hyperbrand redvelvet1278 Ricky84 PatrioticAstronaut riverdeer slamber lemonsun12 jakes_green bluestranger gormlesstwat squeege cerealforeal PoisonTheMonkey Burns4ANewWorld swansea_dave Cortlanderson tarawr matthewandrewdrake