TV Schedule

WW3

  • Public Topic: Everyone is invited to contribute to WW3

    • Destructive Power of Nuclear Weapons

      Excuse the bad music.

      jrchel

      added this

      0 responses

      2 hours ago
    • Bailouts will push US into depression

      The end result of the global economic slowdown may be the U.S. announcing national bankruptcy as the government cannot afford the bailouts that it promised and the market will not bail out the government, Martin Hennecke, senior manager of private clients at Tyche, told CNBC on Thursday. The end result of the global economic slowdown may be the U.S. announcing national bankruptcy as the government cannot afford the bail... more

      46 responses

      14 hours ago
    • Bush Gave "Secret" Orders to Attack Pakistan

      President Bush secretly approved orders in July that for the first time allow American Special Operations forces to carry out ground assaults inside Pakistan without the prior approval of the Pakistani government, according to senior American officials. President Bush secretly approved orders in July that for the first time allow American Special Operations forces to carry out ground a... more

      0 responses

      2 days ago
    • THE ONE VIDEO ALL AMERICANS MUST SEE!- "McCain will make Cheney look like Gha...

      Republicans and Military Personnel Against McCain

      Scott Ritter, the weapons inspector who was right about Bush lying about WMDs, predicts mushroom clouds over America if McCain becomes President.

      If Wes Clark questioning John McCain's ability to lead our country wasn't enough, check out Pat Buchanan saying McCain will make Cheney look like Gandhi. As this chilling video from Aaron Hodgins Davis suggests, more and more Republicans and servicemembers who oppose the war in Iraq and the possibility of another in Iran are coming out against McCain for following in Bush's hawkish footsteps.

      The Bush administration has built a new generation of nuclear weapons that we call ‘usable’ nukes, and they have a nuclear ‘posture’ now, which permits the use of nuclear weapons in a non-nuclear environment if the Commander in Chief deems U.S forces to be at significant risk. If we start bombing Iran (I tell you now it’s not going to work). My concern is that we will use nuclear weapons to break the backbone of Iranian resistance and it may not work, but what it will do is this. It will unleash the nuclear genie. So to all those Americans out there tonight who are saying, you know what, taking on Iran is a good thing… . And if we use nuclear weapons, the genie ain’t going back in the bottle until an American city is taken out by an Islamic weapon in retaliation. So tell me, you want to go to war against Iran, pick your city. Pick your city. Tell me which one you want gone. Seattle? L.A.? Boston? New York? Miami? Pick one! Because at least one’s going. And that’s something we should all think about before marching down this path of insanity.


      McCain as Commander in Chief should scare the living hell out of everyone.
      Republicans and Military Personnel Against McCain ... more

      AcaiHelios

      added this

      6 responses

      4 days ago
    • Russia-China: SCO military alliance challenges US-NATO unipolar world

      Don't want to sound cynical, but this might lead to World War 3.

      9 responses

      15 hours ago
    • WWF Blames Global Cooling On “Carbon Pollution”

      Warming, cooling, who cares? Just shut up and accept CO2 taxation

      1 response

      3 days ago
    • Fabled Enemies

      Jason Bermas' "Fabled Enemies" on the intelligence apparatus and its involvement in 9/11.

      0 responses

      5 days ago
    • Congress is about to pour lighter fluid on Iran

      The U.S. Congress may inadvertently lay the foundations for war against Iran when it reconvenes in Washington this month.

      12 responses

      12 hours ago
    • Palin, Romney, GOP vs. the Bill of Rights

      I watched the GOP convention tonight and was not surprised, but still dismayed, at the attacks by the speakers on America liberties. Romney and Palin both attacked the rights of “terrorists” to constitutional protections. I watched the GOP convention tonight and was not surprised, but still dismayed, at the attacks by the speakers on America liberties. R... more

      1 response

      4 days ago
    • First spotless month in a century

      The sun has reached a milestone not seen for nearly 100 years: an entire month has passed without a single visible sunspot being noted. The sun has reached a milestone not seen for nearly 100 years: an entire month has passed without a single visible sunspot being noted... more

      66 responses

      2 days ago
    • Bush to Putin, "Get out now!". Putin to Bush, "Nyet!"

      21/08/08 "ICH" -- - When Vladimir Putin heard President Bush demand that Russian troops "leave Georgia territory immediately", he did what any sensible leader of a great nation would do; he yawned, scratched his belly and ambled over to the Kremlin frig to see if there were any left-overs from last night's imperial banquet with the French dignitaries. 21/08/08 "ICH" -- - When Vladimir Putin heard President Bush demand that Russian troops "leave Georgia territory immedi... more

      0 responses

      3 days ago
    • War with Iran will not stop "nuclear program".

      A U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities could set Tehran's program back years but would raise the risk of retaliation against American troops in the region and of driving Iran to work even harder to make atomic weapons, U.S. experts and officials say.
      Any U.S. attack -- something the Pentagon insists is not planned but is subject of frequent speculation as Iran defies calls to rein in its nuclear program -- could involve thousands of sorties and missile launches against hundreds of targets.It would be limited to air strikes, rather than a full-scale attack requiring U.S. ground forces, who are now tied down in Iraq and Afghanistan, analysts said.

      But the strike would be hampered by a lack of intelligence on the number and location of the nuclear facilities dispersed throughout Iran, according to nuclear security experts.

      At best, many experts say a U.S. strike could delay Iran's nuclear weapons capability by three to five years. Parts of the program would likely survive, perhaps even critical technologies and certainly know-how.

      "We could set it back probably at least several months maybe a few years but then we run the risk of stimulating them to work even harder next time, burying facilities even deeper, putting in more air defence batteries," said Charles Ferguson, nuclear expert at the Council on Foreign Relations think tank.facilities are scattered throughout the country and could be included as targets, experts speculated. Satellite pictures suggest Iran has dug tunnels around Natanz, for example, which could contain uranium enrichment equipment.

      Nuclear research facilities in Iran's capital might be targeted as well, but such strikes raise the risk of civilian casualties and the attendant risk of international uproar, said U.S. defense officials, speaking on condition of anonymity.The military risks, however, are high, according to both defense analysts and officials.

      Primary among them is the possibility of retaliation against U.S. troops by Islamist militant groups Washington says Tehran supports. The U.S. military accuses Iran of training and equipping the Shi'ite militias in Iraq, which are seen by U.S. commanders as one of the largest threats in that country.

      But particularly frightening to officials inside the Pentagon is the possibility Iran would use suicide boats to attack U.S. ships in the Gulf or to disrupt crude oil trade.
      A U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities could set Tehran's program back years but would raise the risk of retali... more

      stone246

      added this

      0 responses

      15 days ago
    • Fulford asking for US Air-Force to Strike US installation.

      You probably have never heard of him. He has many videos on YouTube predicting events that have taken place recently. From 1998 until 2005 he was the Asian Bureau chief for Forbes magazine. His entire life has been about helping and saving humanity. If you look into his childhood and early choices in life living in the rain forest, followed by his exodus from the mainstream media, it's obvious.

      People, this is a wake up call. Our administration is already waging war on the middle east. And now according to Fulford, they have already started a new war with Myranmar, China, Japan, and Indonesia. With these countries in such close proximity, along with Putin and Ahminedejad meeting this week, I am starting to really get concerned about joint retaliation.

      Many of the videos I have watched the last few days regarding the information that is presented above have included subtitles. The world is watching even if we are not. The world doesn't watch So You Think You Can Dance, UFC, South Park etc.. They watch the news. Since a global power that is blowing the hell out of them is much more concerning than say, who is going to be Americas Next Top Model.

      Even if their is a small chance that this information is accurate, we must not forget how powerful media can be –especially for countries starving for the "truth" about the USA, the worlds new enemy. This video has been up on YouTube less than 24 hours and has nearly 24,000 views. I wonder who is watching?

      There are hours of interviews with Fulford on YouTube. If you can hold judgement on what he says, and note the dates of the interviews, you'll see as I have that he's downright prophetic.

      The next few weeks are going to be bumpy.
      You probably have never heard of him. He has many videos on YouTube predicting events that have taken place recently. From 1998 unti... more

      YourMothersMilk

      added this

      11 responses

      3 days ago
    • Will Global Warming Trigger a WWIII?

      "Will the Arctic be a 21st Century Sarajevo, triggering a major war over energy resources? Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and the United States are at odds over 1.2 million square kilometers (460,000 square miles) of Arctic seabed which could possibly hold 25% of the world's oil and gas.

      Climate change, which is rendering the region increasingly accessible, has upped the ante, making the need for an international resolution of the conflicting claims in the area more pressing. Maritime security and protection of the fragile Arctic ecosystem will also be hot items on the agenda at the May 28 meeting."
      "Will the Arctic be a 21st Century Sarajevo, triggering a major war over energy resources? Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and th... more

      lemonsun12

      added this

      7 responses

      11 days ago
    • Israel tests long range missile, Iran is defiant

      Israel is widely assumed to have nuclear warheads and missiles able to hit Iran. It gave no details of the missile test. A defense official said it was "not just flexing its muscles", three days after Prime Minister Ehud Olmert pledged to consider "all options" to prevent Iran building nuclear weapons.

      This is part two of the latest spar between Israel and Iran.
      Israel is widely assumed to have nuclear warheads and missiles able to hit Iran. It gave no details of the missile test. A defense off... more

      jubal

      added this

      0 responses

      28 days ago
    • "Israel wouldn't dare attack Iran": Ahmadinejad

      "The Iranian response would make them regret it, and they know this."

      Looks like one of the four horsemen of the apocalypse is looming on the horizon.

      This photo is so haunting and mysterious, I don't know why it comes with the article, but it seems almost eerily appropriate.

      This reminds me of when the first gulf war was under way and they were bombing Iraq back in 1990 something and Iraq launched Skud missiles against Israel and some of them landed in Tel Aviv. Iran has better missiles than the Iraqi Army did at that time, surely Iran and Israel could destroy each other ten times over.

      Is this just more posturing or do you think that they really mean business? Do you think that we are on the verge of the mother of all family feuds? After all, aren't Israel and Islam brother's under Abraham?

      What do you think?
      "The Iranian response would make them regret it, and they know this." ... more

      jubal

      added this

      0 responses

      25 days ago
showing 1 - 16 of 16

related topics
WW3

Contributors (111)
WW3

PatrioticAstronaut plusaf EdKnowsAll YourMothersMilk ace_ofgabriel SonofLiberty1 McGaspa vladbox thepatient rube intelligenceisacurse J_current arcticspirit 1percent stratuscloud9 jubal Vierotchka swonce Conniepae kewal91 willyb schobiz celestialceiling Amber_LaStrega tracyetheridge jimwiz3416 simonedward Robroy1 SDLN aswift1 huntre smart_giraffe kennymotown stephenthomson miles_ahead Parasol29 joshua2310 myowndesignjf NeoDotCom Ragan stone246 T_Rose daboz gracesteban PressCore _thejournalist_ ClayCreature neocongo Sublime_Emperor regjoeschmo