TV Schedule

judicial

  • Public Topic: Everyone is invited to contribute to judicial

    • TAKE ACTION: Tell Congresss to Stand Up and Check the Balance

      In exactly two weeks, we are going to find out whether members of Congress have any respect for the institution they represent. We will see whether they have the courage to stand up to the Bush administration and defend the Constitution they took an oath to protect. Specifically, we will discover whether they are willing to take the measures necessary to ensure that Bush administration officials testify before Congress.

      On July 10, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing to investigate the firings of nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006 and the questionable prosecution and imprisonment of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman. Karl Rove, a potentially key figure in both incidents, has been issued a subpoena to testify before the committee. Rove's lawyer has said that Rove will not appear.

      Congress has a few options here. First, if Rove fails to appear, they could pass criminal contempt charges against him, as they did against White House chief of staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers. This is good, but will not result in immediate testimony.

      The second option is to have Karl Rove arrested, under the theory of inherent contempt, and brought to Congress to testify. This is better, but may still be eventually unsatisfying if Rove ends up testifying yet asserts executive privilege repeatedly in order to avoid disclosing important information.

      Another option - and the one supported by the American Freedom Campaign Action Fund - is to tell the president immediately that he will be impeached if members of his administration do not provide full testimony before Congress by a date certain in July. This has historical precedent as one of the three articles of impeachment ultimately brought against President Richard Nixon was based on his refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas.

      The final option is to do nothing and set a precedent for the future by which any administration can claim that Congress does not have the ability to force executive branch officials to testify before Congress. This would be an affront to our Constitution and Congress is dancing perilously close to this line already.

      We cannot allow Congress to become subservient to the executive branch. It must exert its oversight authority and force administration officials to testify. Please tell your U.S. representative to take whatever steps are necessary to compel testimony.

      Thank you for sharing your feelings with your U.S. representative.

      Steve

      Steve Fox
      Campaign Director
      American Freedom Campaign Action Fund

      I got the email a week ago. Sign petitions, send emails, and mail letters. heres links to legislators and bills.
      http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/
      http://www.house.gov/
      http://catalog.loc.gov/
      In exactly two weeks, we are going to find out whether members of Congress have any respect for the institution they represent. We wi... more

      7c0m9

      added this

      1 response

      1 month ago
    • Gag lifted - Brewster speaks

      The FBI has withdrawn an unconstitutional national security letter issued to the Internet Archive after a legal challenge from the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. As the result of a settlement agreement, the FBI withdrew the NSL, agreed to the unsealing of the case, and lifted a gag order — finally allowing the Archive’s founder, Brewster Kahle, to speak out for the first time about his battle against the record demand. Check out this video for Kahle's story in his own words.


      Our website features the documents that were previously sealed in the case. The Internet Archive case is our third challenge to national security letters. We won the last round in our Internet Service Provider case: In September 2007, Judge Victor Marrero struck down the national security letter provision of the Patriot Act, calling the NSL gag power unconstitutional under the First and Fourth Amendments. The government appealed that decision: The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments in that case, Doe v. Mukasey, in June. You can learn more about all of our national security letter cases at www.aclu.org/nsl.

      Posted by Rachel Myers, ACLU in Free Speech, Government Spying at 10:27 AM

      _______________________________

      from TouchArt.net and OneEarthBlog.blogspot.com
      The FBI has withdrawn an unconstitutional national security letter issued to the Internet Archive after a legal challenge from the ACL... more

      TouchArt

      added this

      5 responses

      1 month ago
showing 1 - 2 of 2

Contributors (6)
judicial

TouchArt 7c0m9 echoz PlatoTacius Hawkmang onechance